澳洲塔斯马尼亚作业代写:个人的问题

Keywords:澳洲塔斯马尼亚作业代写

但也有问题，因为个人的问题并不重要，因此布莱克和莫顿网格需要适应的文化控制，即文化的需要作为一个整体来代替生产力的问题和个人的需要取代工人的个人关注。因此，这些需要的最大化将是9,9国家领导人保护文化和社会法律而存在的权利保护，不能排除对法律的作用，即允许个人参与政府和法院行使自己的权利。这是一个社会主义民主社会，它满足了社会的需要和个人的需要，而不是个人利益，即一个更全面的模式。9,1会放任系统在国家现在社会/文化控制和自由主义泛滥的社会和文化的费用。9是一个极权制度的社会里是被文化所定义的几–这也可能是一个政教合一的制度如伊朗伊斯兰共和国。因此，适应这个布莱克和穆顿网格是一个非常重要的工具。1是一种文化，文化没有很强的关联，即一个宽松的工作的人的生存和领导最满意的，这是多少一样，许多不发达的国家，那里有非常丰富的和平等的不足非常差，没有社会良知。5是平衡文化和个性的角色，但有两个而不是两个工作在9,9模型之间的冲突。该模型还寻找自我满意的领导人，在真理的自由民主将满足这5类。
澳洲塔斯马尼亚作业代写:个人的问题
However there are problems because the concerns of individuals are not important therefore the Blake and Mouton Grid needs to be adapted for cultural control, i.e. the needs of the culture as a whole should replace the concerns of productivity and the needs of the individual replaces the personal concern of workers. Therefore the maximization of these needs would be 9,9 where the leaders of state protect the culture and laws of society but there is some form of rights protection which cannot be derogated against, i.e. the role of law allows for individuals to participate in the government and enforce their rights in the court. This is a socialist-democratic society where the needs of the society and the needs of the individual without self-interest are met, i.e. a more holistic model. 9,1 would be a laissez faire system where the state has now societal/cultural control and libertarianism runs rampant at the expense of the society and culture. 1,9 would be a totalitarian system where the society is ruled by culture as defined by a few – this could also be a theocratic system such as the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore adapting this Blake and Mouton grid is a very important tool. 1,1 is a culture and culture where there is no strong associations, i.e. a loose working of people to survive and the leaders are the most satisfied, which is much the same as many underdeveloped countries where there is the very rich and very poor and no social conscience to equal out the deficiencies. 5,5 is the role of balancing culture and individuality but there is a conflict between the two rather than the working of the two in the 9,9 model. Also the leaders in this model look for self-satisfaction, in truth the liberal democracy would satisfy this 5,5 category.