澳洲RMIT ASSIGNMENT代写:文学的学习环境
Keywords:澳洲RMIT ASSIGNMENT代写
文学的学习环境的学习障碍护士建议，压力是一个挑战性的行为在工作场所的影响。发现照顾智障人士的表现具有挑战性的行为有助于员工倦怠，旷工的人的压力，在服务士气低落和高周转率（尖锐，2002，P12）。似乎是一个庞大且不断增长的文献中，专门针对应力与智力残疾的成年人的专业照顾者（哈顿等，1999，p253）时，对工作环境的影响文献压力体验发现暴力是照顾者的经验，工作压力和工作压力有关被证明是与倦怠（尼达姆等，2005，P238）。杰克逊等人的一项类似的研究（2002，P13）提出，有可能是接触暴力和倦怠之间的直接联系。这两篇文章认为暴力对护士在一般的医院工作环境中运作。有人建议，对护士的任何暴力行为可能会导致压力，烧伤，并可能是一个因素，在招聘和保留。然而，有争议的，在学习障碍设置面对那些经常表现出挑战性的行为，因为他们的残疾，那么工作环境是更大的压力，导致在随后的因素强度。同样重要的是要注意，这两篇文章依赖于他人的工作，他们的研究结果，而不是进行自己的初步研究，建议将有更多有效的证据。
澳洲RMIT ASSIGNMENT代写:文学的学习环境
The literature exploring the working environment of a learning disabilities nurse has suggested that the stress is an effect of challenging behaviour in the workplace. It was found that the stress of caring for people with intellectual disabilities who exhibit challenging behaviour has contributed to staff burnout, absenteeism, low morale and high turnover rates within the service (Sharp, 2002, p12). There seems be a large and growing literature that specifically addresses stress in professional carers of adults with intellectual disabilities (Hatton et al, 1999, p253)When reviewing the literature on the influence of work environment for experiences of stress it was found that violence is related to the caregivers’ experience of stress at work and that work-related stress has been shown to be associated with burnout (Needham et al 2005, p238). A similar study by Jackson et al (2002, p13) proposed that there might be a direct link between exposure to violence and burnout. The two articles considered violence against nurses functioning within a general hospital working environment. It is proposed that any violence against nurses might lead to stress, burn-out and possibly be a factor in recruitment and retention. However, debatably, within a learning disability setting faced by those who frequently exhibit challenging behaviours because of their disability, then arguably the working environment is more stressful resulting in an intensity of the ensuing factors. It is also important to note that these two articles relied on the work of others for their findings and not by undertaking their own primary research that it is suggested would have given more valid evidence.
