悉尼作业代写:卢梭社会契约论

Keywords:悉尼作业代写:卢梭社会契约论

我认为卢梭社会契约论的核心最大的问题是他处理个性的方式。他的社会契约说，如果一个人不同意共同意志，那么他一定是错的，为了自己的利益，他必须被迫服从共同意志。卢梭说，如果有人拒绝服从大众意志他就会被整个身体强迫服从;这就是说，他将被迫获得自由。密尔无疑会认为这种强制性的服从是多数人的暴政，因为他坚信个性是需要保护的激情信念是需要保护和培养的。正因如此，这篇文章表明了他对他认为社会压制不一致的看法的厌恶。通过这个卢梭认为这确保了一个社会不会依赖于任何一个人。和卢梭一样，密尔也谈到了一种公民或社会自由;然而，与卢梭不同的是，他不推测自然状态。密尔认为他的理论是基于功利主义的，而不是自然状态和公民社会的比较。我认为密尔的论点更有说服力，因为他没有假设我们有自然权利。密尔似乎不认为我们有自然权利，即使我们有，卢梭也没有告诉我们，我们如何能确定它们是什么。卢梭似乎认为我们有一种内在的自由存在于自然状态中，他想将个人自由与公民社会相结合。
悉尼作业代写:卢梭社会契约论
I think the biggest problem at the heart of Rousseau s social contract theory is the way he deals with individuality. His social contract says that if an individual disagrees with the general will then they must be wrong, and for their own good they must be forced to conform to the general will. Rousseau says that if anyone refuses to obey the general will he will be compelled to do so by the whole body; which means nothing else than that he will be forced to be free 6. Mill would undoubtedly consider such forced conformity a tyranny of the majority because of his strong belief that individuality is something that should be protected passionate belief that individuality is something that should be protected and nurtured. As such, the essay illustrates his disgust at how he believed society squelches nonconformity.Through this Rousseau thinks that this makes sure a society will not depend upon any one person.Like Rousseau, Mill talks about a type of civil or social freedom; however, unlike Rousseau he doesn t speculate about a state of nature . Rather, Mill’states that his theory is justified by utilitarianism and not a comparison between a state of nature and civil society. I think Mill’s argument is more persuasive because he isn t making an assumption that we have natural rights . Mill doesn t seem to think we have natural rights, and even if we do, Rousseau doesn t tell us how we can be certain of what they are. Rousseau appears to think we have an intrinsic freedom that exists in the state of nature, and he wants to merge the individual liberty one supposedly has in the state of nature with civil society.