澳洲阿德莱德代写 性别资本

Keywords:澳洲阿德莱德代写 性别资本

作者利用定性研究来考察男性的性别资本体验，以及我们如何利用男性特质(男性身体)、男性特质和女性特质作为资本的形式。这项研究是基于对护理和建筑等性别化行业男性员工的深入访谈。面试时间约为60分钟，面试官为女性。他们根据自己的经验询问参与者有关性别的职业问题。本研究的主要局限在于它可能是一个不稳定的讨论，因为性别经验有时是矛盾和不稳定的。此外，在“女性”角色中工作的男性样本也非常有限。此外，文章没有提到他们收集了多少样本。此外，他们只选择男性工人作为样本，这是有限的信息，以达到更深层次的理解男性和女性的不同观点。然而，他们的目的是探索男性和女性如何表达职业社会空间。他们仍然提供了一些有用的信息来描述男性工人的性别经验。研究结果表明，男性的身体确实会帮助男性员工晋升到管理岗位，男性的阳刚之气会为他们赢得更多的就业机会。例如，一个建筑工人，仅仅拥有男性的身体是不足以保证升职的。他们还发现，许多从事女性工作的男性因为从事女性工作而受到性别限制。综上所述，作者认为性别资本是职业隔离持续的主要原因。它们表明了性别资本对特定职业的男性和女性的优势，并为职业选择提供了更详细的方法。这项研究对我的主题可能不是很有用，但它是一个有趣的方法，因为人们可能认为职业隔离是基于性别差异。例如，护士应该是女性或者公交车司机应该是男性。这项研究发现，性别有时会限制员工的职业选择和晋升。
澳洲阿德莱德代写 性别资本
The authors draws on a qualitative research to examine men’s gender capital experience and how we utilize maleness ( a male body), masculinity and femininity as forms of capitals. The research was based on in-depth interviews with men employees in gendered industries such as nursing and construction. The interviews was about 60 minutes and the interviewers are female. They asked the participants about the gendered occupational questions by their own experiences. The main limitation of this research is that it might be a unstable discussion because the gendered experience is sometimes contradictive and unstable. Also, there was a  very limited sample from  men working in ‘feminine’ roles. Furthermore, the article did not mention how many samples they have collected. Moreover, they only selected men workers as samples and it was limited information to achieve a deeper understanding the different perspectives between men and women. However, they aim to explore how men and women express occupational social space. They still provide some useful information to describe the male workers’ gendered experiences. The findings express that a male body did take some advantage to assist the male workers in promotion to management positions and masculinity leads to greater success in gaining more employment opportunities for them. A construction worker for instance, simply being in a male body is not enough to guarantee promotion. They also found gender limits that many men who work in femininity suffered because of they were doing a feminine job. In conclusion, the author stated  that it is important to understand gender capital as the main reason of the continuation of occupational segregation. They demonstrated the advantage of gender capital for men but women in specific occupations and also provided a more detailed approach to occupational choice. This research might not be so useful for my topic but it is an interesting approach as people might think that the occupation segregation is based on gender difference. For example, the nurse should be female or the bus driver should be male. This research found that gender sometimes limited a worker’s career choice and advancement.

Huppatz, K & Goodwin, S 2013, ‘Masculinised jobs, feminised jobs and men’s ‘gender capital’ experiences: Understanding occupational segregation in Australia’, Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2-3, pp. 291-308.