布里斯班心理学论文代写:乐观与悲观

Keywords:布里斯班心理学论文代写

标准化范式描述性范式，尽量避免情绪等主观factors.decision-making行为。因此，尽管情绪在许多行为理论中起着关键的作用，但它很少被视为人类判断和决策行为的重要组成部分。早期决策理论完全排除情绪影响的作用。与标准化范式相比，描述性决策研究在对待情绪态度的理论上向前迈进了一大步，出现了一些情感色彩词，如希望与恐惧、乐观与悲观。由于理论研究的需要，研究者所描述的决策不得不提到情绪，但整个决策领域的发展，描述性决策研究已被视为认知，而不是情感。尽管强调了这方面的知识，情绪的重要性越来越多的决策者意识到。强调在该领域的早期支持者之一，他情感决策的重要性（1980），他比较了认知评估测算，对刺激的情绪反应通常速度更快、更根本的，这种反应经常自动生成并指导后续的信息处理，使个体在决策面前做出快速反应：shafiretal（1993）也承认情绪，作用有限，他们承认：个人的选择，有时从情感判断，排除法官的选择充分评估。khanemna（1991）在判断和决策中也提到：个人观点，“在传统的决策研究，认知和心理生理因素和情感因素和社会因素往往是分开的，但理性行为模式比较的例子己延伸到情绪优先研究。

布里斯班心理学论文代写:乐观与悲观

The downside is that the sampled object from Sydney geographical limitations, and the male to female ratio is not balanced, the experiment did not continue to explore the impact of gender on the decision-making.
Standardized paradigm descriptive paradigm, try to avoid emotions and other subjective factors.Decision-making behavior. Thus, despite the emotions play a key role in many behavioral theory, but it is rarely seen as an important component of human judgment and decision-making behavior. Early decision theory completely exclude the role of emotional impact. Compared to the standardization paradigm, descriptive decision research in the treat emotional attitude forward a big step in their theory, there have been some emotional color words, such as hope and fear, optimism and pessimism. Due to the needs of the theoretical research, the researchers describe the decision-making have to mention the emotional, but the entire decision-making developments in the field, descriptive decision research has been seen as cognitive, rather than emotional. Despite the emphasis on this knowledge, the importance of emotions more and more decision-making researchers realized. Stressed the importance of emotional decision-making in the field one of the early supporters of Zajonc (1980), he compared the cognitive assessment estimates, emotional reactions to stimuli are often faster and more fundamental, this reaction often automatically generated and guide subsequent information processing, so that the individual can make a rapid response in the face of decisions: Shafiretal (1993) also acknowledged the limited role of the emotions, they admitted: individual choice and sometimes from emotional judgment, the judge ruled out a full assessment of the choice. Khanemna (1991) also mentioned in the judgment and decision-making: personal point of view, "in the traditional decision-making research, cognitive and psycho-physical factors and emotional and social factors are often separated, but the behavior and rational mode Comparative example hexyl extending to mood priority research.