澳大利亚unsw代写 毒气化学武器
Keywords:澳大利亚unsw代写 毒气化学武器
事件始于2011年,当时一群男孩在叙利亚德拉的学校墙上喷反政府涂鸦。自战争开始以来,叙利亚已有50多万人被杀。当地方当局看到这些涂鸦时,他们围捕了这些小男孩和一打嫌疑犯。这些孩子被拘留和折磨了45天,所以德拉的人们走上街头和平抗议,要求释放这些男孩。警方认为这次抗议是暴动,并开始发射催泪瓦斯,设置路障。特种部队随后从大马士革飞往德拉平息骚乱,结果他们向人群开枪,在第一天就杀死了两名抗议者,并造成多人受伤。第二天,特种部队杀死了几名抗议者和一名儿童;任何受伤的人如果去医院就会被逮捕。更多的杀戮发生了,人们感到愤怒,导致成千上万的人从其他地方来到城市抗议。当局释放了这些男孩,但抗议并没有停止;它演变成了一场蔓延到全国其他城市的起义。2011年7月,反政府组织叙利亚自由军成立,旨在推翻引发内战的阿萨德政权。叙利亚自由军不是在这场武装冲突中出现的唯一反叛组织,国际舞台上的一些国家在这场内战中发挥了重要作用,这场内战随着时间的推移不断升级,已经影响到数十万平民。那么,为什么国际社会在履行保护叙利亚人民的职责方面仍然无所作为呢?RtoP原则在叙利亚问题上是如何失败的?利比亚事件是否影响了RtoP在叙利亚的实施?当叙利亚发生毒气/化学武器袭击时,国际社会无法阻止,甚至无法积极应对。R2P原则指出,国家是不愿或无力保护本国人民的,国际社会有责任作出反应,介入并提供帮助。但这种责任在哪里呢?本章将尝试评估RtoP在叙利亚应用的法律和政治考量。第二部分将讨论参与叙利亚战争的不同角色。第三部分将讨论R2P原则的原则,以确定其在叙利亚危机中的适用性,以及其适用的法律和政治考虑。这将成为我调查在叙利亚危机中未能执行这一原则的基础。
澳大利亚unsw代写 毒气化学武器
It began in 2011 when a group of boys sprayed anti-government graffiti’s on their school wall in Deraa, Syria. Over half a million people have been killed in Syria since the start of the war. When the local authorities saw the graffiti, they rounded up the young boys along with a dozen suspects. The kids were detained and tortured for 45 days so the people of Deraa took it to the streets to peacefully protest demanding for the boys to be released. The police considered the protest as riot and started firing teargas and forming barricades. Special forces were then flown to Deraa from Damascus to quell the riot and as a result they opened fire to the crowds killing two of the protesters on the first day and left many wounded. On the second day, the special forces killed several protesters and also a child; and anybody who is wounded was arrested if they went to hospitals. More killings were made, and people were outraged which resulted in thousands of people from other places coming to the city to protest. The authorities released the boys, but the protest did not stop; it turned into an uprising that spread to other cities in the country.In July 2011, the Free Syrian Army a rebel group was established with the goal to overthrow the Assad regime which started the civil war. The Free Syrian Army was not the only rebel group that emerged during this armed conflict, and some states in the international arena has played a major role in this civil war that has escalated over time and has already affected hundreds of thousands of civilians. So, why has the international community remained inactive in fulfilling their duty to protect the Syrian population? How did the RtoP doctrine fail in the case of Syria? Could it be that the Libyan case has affected the implementation of RtoP in Syria? When gas/chemical attacks happened in Syria the international community was not able to prevent, or even react to this actively. R2P principles states that is the state is unwilling or unable to protect its own people, the international community has the responsibility to react, to step in and help. But where is this responsibility? This chapter will attempt to evaluate the legal and political considerations in the application of RtoP in Syria. Part II will talk about the different actors involved in the Syrian war. Part III will discuss the principles of the R2P doctrine to determine its applicability in the Syrian crisis, and the legal and political considerations of its application. This will serve as the basis of my investigation on the failed implementation of the doctrine in the Syrian crisis.