拉筹伯代写论文:公共管理

Keywords:拉筹伯代写论文

国家内部的公共管理有着广泛而广泛的定义。它可以包括那些在特定情况下为某一政府工作的私营公司的公司，或者它可以包容最近全球政治的趋势，以更大程度地引入个人对公共事务的兴趣。当然，这是非常重要的，当讨论外源性和内源性因素对国家的公共管理的形状的影响。其次，有时也很难确定什么构成了外部或内部的影响。在全球网络容量和全球舆论的形成比以往任何时候都全球化，如何完全有可能产生的影响直接从国家的内部机器，或从网络的全球趋势，影响和压力？当然，外部性与内部性的术语必须适应将这一问题。例如，通常认为一个给定状态的人口往往是内生的，因为人们来自于该状态。然而，这些人也有机会获得全球信息，趋势和意识形态的潮流，优先考虑某些观点和趋势的重要性。因此，因为可以说，一个公共政策变化的第一个例子是基于全球趋势，那么人民对国家的影响，因此必须在一定程度上外生。这个困难可以，当然，可以适应几乎任何东西，从社团的利益，对美国外交政策的一个反应。在这篇文章中我将首先在一些选择的例子，传统上被认为是内源性和外源性因素往往形状和变异的大小，对给定的政府公共管理能力的弹性和整体文化与自然，特别是在美国、英国、俄罗斯和欧盟，对如何在政治修辞是指公共管理发生了很大的变化，但在规模和公共部门的运作的影响是，在大多数情况下，可以忽略不计。同时，我会看看所谓的在所谓的民主最大的内源性因素，即公众舆论，往往是失去了一系列其他的外源性压力，如增加企业的压力，全球意识形态和非政府组织在公共管理中沉淀的削减开支。
拉筹伯代写论文:公共管理
Public administration within countries can have a far-reaching and wide number of definitions. It can include those companies from private sectors that work for a given government in certain instances, or it can be inclusive of the recent trend in global politics toward the greater introduction of private interest in public affairs. Naturally, this is of major importance when discussing the impact that exogenous and endogenous factors have upon the shape of public administration within countries. Secondly, it is also sometimes very difficult to determine what constitutes an outside or an inside influence. In a global world of increased capacity for networking and the shaping of global opinion than ever before, how is it entirely possible for an influence to emerge directly from the internal machinery of the state, or from a network of global trends, influences and pressures? Surely the terminology of externality and internality has to be adapted to incorporate this problematic. For instance, usually it is considered that the population of a given state tends to be endogenous, because the people arise from within that state. However, these people also have access to a blizzard of global information, trends and streams of ideology that prioritize the importance of certain opinions and trends. Therefore, because it can be said that the first instance of public policy change is based on global trends, then the people’s impact on the state must therefore be, to an extent exogenous. This difficulty can, of course, be adapted to almost anything else, from corporatist interest, to a states reaction to foreign policy. In this essay I will look firstly at a few choice examples of how certain, traditionally regarded endogenous and exogenous factors tend to shape and mutate the size, elasticity and overall culture and nature of the public administration faculty of given governments, looking in particular at the USA, the UK, Russia and the EU, and upon how while political rhetoric referring to public administration has changed, but its impact upon the size and the functioning of public departments has been, in the majority of cases, negligible. Also, I will look at how supposedly the largest endogenous factor in an alleged democracy, namely public opinion, is often lost to a swathe of other, exogenous pressures such as increased corporatist pressures, global ideology and NGOs that precipitate spending cuts in public administration.