澳洲墨尔本论文代写:科斯加德的帮助

Keywords:澳洲墨尔本论文代写:科斯加德的帮助

虽然我相信科斯加德在帮助一个无辜的人对抗邪恶的责任上讲得很好，但我认为她的一些推理是错误的。科斯加德认为，如果有人对你撒谎，你也可以对他们撒谎。科斯加德认为，既然凶手在他们的动机上对你撒谎，你可能会以假相待。我认为这不是一个强有力的论点。谎言是一种故意的信任的邀请，是一种对信仰的违背，而凶手对你撒谎这一事实并不能证明你对他们撒谎是正确的，这也绝对不是使撒谎道德的理由。我对这件事的看法是以眼还眼，我认为两个错误加在一起是不对的。仅仅因为有人对你撒谎，你就不能撒谎，如果我们的世界以这种方式运转，除了混乱什么都没有。我相信，在判断谎言是对是错的时候，关键在于当事人的意图。纳粹有无缘无故杀害无辜人民的邪恶意图，而你们有保护自己和他人的善良意图。即使在当时的德国，移交犹太人是法律规定的，但当时的社会是腐败和有缺陷的。我认为，唯一可以不向门口的凶手撒谎的情况是，你躲在家里的那个人也是凶手。我相信说谎在拯救无辜生命时是可以接受的。
澳洲墨尔本论文代写:科斯加德的帮助
Although I believe Korsgaard has made a good point regarding the duty to aid an innocent person against evil, I believe some of her reasoning is incorrect. Korsgaard’s argues that if someone lies to you, you can lie back to them. Korsgaard argues that since the murderer is lying to you about their motives, you may respond to a lie with a lie. I believe this is not a strong argument. A lie is an intentional invitation of trust and a breaking of faith, and the fact that the murderer is lying to you doesn’t justify you lying to them back, and it definitely is not a reason that makes lying moral in any way. My reasoning regarding this matter is the eye for an eye argument, I believe two wrongs don’t make it right. Just because someone lies to you doesn’t make it right to lie back, and if our world operated this way there would be nothing but chaos.I believe when deciding whether lying is right or wrong, it all comes down to the intensions of the parties involved. The Nazis have evil intensions of murdering innocent people for no reason, and you have good intensions of protecting yourself and others. Even though in Germany back in those days it was the law to hand over the Jews, that society was corrupt and flawed. The only time I would argue that it is permissible not to lie to the murderer at the door would be if the person you were hiding in your house were also a murderer. I believe lying is acceptable when saving an innocent life.