澳洲昆士兰代写论文:哲学家柏拉图

Keywords:澳洲昆士兰代写论文:哲学家柏拉图

斐多篇是哲学家柏拉图写的苏格拉底对话。对话从旁观者的角度描述了苏格拉底最后的几个小时以及他的对话。在斐多篇中提出并讨论了几个论点，除此之外，苏格拉底还提出了一个关于来世的神话。斐多篇的主要论点是对立的论点，来自回忆的论点，来自密切关系的论点，以及第四种关于物质和非物质的区别的论点。这些论证的目的在于证明灵魂的不朽，同时也试图证明毕达哥拉斯关于轮回的观点。在对话接近尾声时出现的神话关系到灵魂的终结，这取决于它在死亡时有多纯洁或腐败。苏格拉底戏剧性的死亡结束了对话。反义词的论点声称灵魂是轮回的。它的原理是事物在一个循环中从两个对立的事物过渡。在某样东西变小之前，它就变大了，因为在它变小之前不可能变小。此外，如果物体变得更小，而不是更大，最终所有的东西都会变得很小。如果反过来，所有的东西都变得更大，而不是更小，所有的东西最终会是一个东西，因为所有的东西会结合在一起。如果是这样的话，我们就会注意到事物只会变得更小、更短或更丑，而不是它们的对立面，反之亦然。苏格拉底通过引用可观察到的例子表明事物确实从两个对立面过渡。他将这与死亡作了对比，并声称必须有一个生命和死亡的循环，否则一切都会死亡，反之亦然。
澳洲昆士兰代写论文:哲学家柏拉图
The Phaedo is a Socratic dialogue written by the philosopher Plato. The dialogue gives an account of the final hours of Socrates and his conversations from the viewpoint of a bystander. Several arguments are presented and discussed in The Phaedo, in addition to these a myth concerning the afterlife is presented by Socrates. The main arguments from The Phaedo are the argument from opposites, the argument from recollection, the argument from affinities, and a fourth argument concerning the difference between corporeal and incorporeal things. These arguments aim at proving the immortality of the soul, and also attempt to prove the Pythagorean conception of reincarnation. The myth presented near the closing of the dialogue concerns the terminus of the soul, which depends on how pure or corrupt it is at death. The dramatic death of Socrates concludes the dialogue.The argument from opposites claims that the soul is reincarnated. It lies on the principle that things transition from two opposites in a cycle. Before something becomes small, it was large, for it could not have been small before it became small. Moreover, if things only became smaller, and not larger, eventually everything would be miniscule. And if it was the other way around, where everything only became larger, and not smaller, everything would eventually be one thing, because everything would have joined together. If this were the case then we would notice that things only become smaller, shorter, or uglier, and never their opposites, or vice versa. Socrates shows that things do transition from two opposites, by referencing to observable examples. He contrasts this to death, and claims that there has to be a cycle of becoming alive and becoming dead, or else everything would become dead, or vice versa.