澳洲哲学作业代写:死刑犯罪

Keywords:澳洲哲学作业代写:死刑犯罪

随着死刑犯罪的增多，死刑作为一种报应性司法，在震慑犯罪方面的效力问题引起了激烈的争论。因此，学者和法学专家提出了矛盾的观点和不同的理论建构，以检验死刑适用于激进犯罪的合理性。本文批判性地探讨了死刑是否应该对杀人者强制执行，以及其背后的原因。在这一过程中，本文考察了死刑的积极方面，并总结了反驳意见：死刑或死刑是指对各种犯罪行为依法判处死刑。专家认为，从古代文明到现代刑事司法的应用，死刑已经被广泛使用。死刑的使用因司法管辖权的不同而有所不同，一些国家适用死刑，而另一些国家则废除死刑，班纳（Banner）（2002年，第45页），死刑的实施不仅在现代而且在古代历史上引起了学者和专家的不同意见和矛盾观点对林恩的惩罚。死刑的支持者认为，总的来说，利大于弊。
澳洲哲学作业代写:死刑犯罪
With the increase in capital offenses, there are heated debates over the efficacy of death penalty in deterring crime and as a form of retribution justice. Consequently, scholars and legal experts have come up with contradicting perspectives and divergent theoretical constructs for examining the appropriateness of using the capital punishment for radical crimes. This paper critically examines whether death penalty should be mandatory for people who kill others and the reasons behind it. In doing this, the paper examines the positive aspects of the death penalty and summarizes the counterarguments.The death penalty or capital punishment refers to the lawful punishment of death for a wide variety of offenses. Experts argue that capital punishment has been used widely from the ancient civilizations to modern criminal justice applications. The use of capital punishment varies from one jurisdiction to the other with several states applying the death penalty while others abolishing it, Banner (2002, p.45).The infliction of the death penalty has elicited divergent opinions and contradicting perspectives from scholars and experts not only in modern times but also in the ancient history of the punishment Lynn. The proponents of the death penalty argue that in general, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.